POLMETH Archives

Political Methodology Society

POLMETH@LISTSERV.WUSTL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tobin Grant <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Political Methodology Society <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 19 Oct 2005 14:33:53 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
Some colleagues are putting together lists of "classics" for subfields in
political science.  The idea is to have a collection of 20 or so books (or
other major workds) that grad students should be familiar with when
preparing for exams.  These are works that help define major problems
addressed by scholars.  Regardess of whether such a list is useful, there
is obviously going to be differences in the way previous research is used
in each subfield.  I would appreciate any thoughts on whether such a list
could be constructed and if so what you would nominate for such a list.
Feel free to email me directly ([log in to unmask]).  I'll report back next
week on the "canon".

Tobin Grant
Southern Illinois University




__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com

**********************************************************
             Political Methodology E-Mail List
        Editor: Karen Long Jusko <[log in to unmask]>
**********************************************************
        Send messages to [log in to unmask]
  To join the list, cancel your subscription, or modify
           your subscription settings visit:

          http://polmeth.wustl.edu/polmeth.php

********************************************************** 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2