POLMETH Archives

Political Methodology Society

POLMETH@LISTSERV.WUSTL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Mooney, Christopher" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Political Methodology Society <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:36:17 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
I am finishing up my syllabus for an "intro to research" grad course,
and I continue my struggle for a better term for the aspect of research
that we usually call "research design." By this, I mean that class of
choices/techniques that include panel study, case study,
cross-sectional, time-series, etc., designs. I don't like to use
"research design" because I argue that all choices in planning a
research project are about its design (including measurement, sampling,
etc. choices, and even choices about stating the research question). In
the past few years, I have been using the phrase "observational plan,"
but I don't really like that much either. Any suggestions? 

Chris
*******************************************************
Chris Mooney
Institute of Government and Public Affairs, PAC 466
University of Illinois at Springfield
One University Plaza, MS PAC 466
Springfield, IL  62703-5407
USA

voice: (217) 206-6573
fax: (217) 206-6542

**********************************************************
             Political Methodology E-Mail List
        Editor: Karen Long Jusko <[log in to unmask]>
**********************************************************
        Send messages to [log in to unmask]
  To join the list, cancel your subscription, or modify
           your subscription settings visit:

          http://polmeth.wustl.edu/polmeth.php

********************************************************** 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2