Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:34:26 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Title: Statistical Inference After Model Selection
Authors: Richard Berk, Lawrence Brown, Linda Zhao
Entrydate: 2009-04-29 09:19:49
Keywords: Statistical Inference, Model Selection
Abstract: Conventional statistical inference requires that a
model of how the data were generated be known before the data
are analyzed. Yet in criminology, and in the social sciences
more broadly, a variety of model selection procedures are
routinely undertaken followed by statistical tests and
confidence intervals computed for a "final" model. In this
paper, we examine such practices and show how they are typically
misguided. The parameters being estimated are no longer well
defined, and post-model-selection sampling distributions are
mixtures with properties that are very different from what is
conventionally assumed. Confidence intervals and statistical
tests do not perform as they should. We examine in some detail
the specific mechanisms responsible. We also offer some
suggestions for better practice.
http://polmeth.wustl.edu/retrieve.php?id=902
**********************************************************
Political Methodology E-Mail List
Editors: Melanie Goodrich, <[log in to unmask]>
Xun Pang, <[log in to unmask]>
**********************************************************
Send messages to [log in to unmask]
To join the list, cancel your subscription, or modify
your subscription settings visit:
http://polmeth.wustl.edu/polmeth.php
**********************************************************
|
|
|