POLMETH Archives

Political Methodology Society

POLMETH@LISTSERV.WUSTL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Political Methodology Society <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 12 Nov 2006 11:13:45 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
title:         Negative Results in Social Science
authors:       David Lehrer, Janine Leschke, Stefan Lhachimi, Ana Vasiliu, Brigitte  Weiffen
entrydate:     2006-11-11 15:08:37
keywords:      methodology, negative results, philosophy of science, publication bias
abstract:      Do academic publication standards reflect or determine research results? The article proposes minimal criteria for distinguishing useful ‘unpublishable’ results from low-quality research, and argues that the virtues of negative results have been overlooked. We consider the fate these results have suffered thus far, review arguments for and against their publication, and introduce a new initiative—a journal to disseminate negative results and advance debate on their recognition and use.

http://polmeth.wustl.edu/retrieve.php?id=661

**********************************************************
             Political Methodology E-Mail List
        Editor: Karen Long Jusko <[log in to unmask]>
**********************************************************
        Send messages to [log in to unmask]
  To join the list, cancel your subscription, or modify
           your subscription settings visit:

          http://polmeth.wustl.edu/polmeth.php

********************************************************** 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2