POLMETH Archives

Political Methodology Society

POLMETH@LISTSERV.WUSTL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Antonio P. Ramos" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Political Methodology Society <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 31 Dec 2008 18:13:27 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
Hi Carlos,

In order to be a valid an instrument, your input should meet several
assumptions - not just be statistically significant correlated with your
endogenous regressor. However, most of these assumptions are not testable
but sometimes defensible on theoretical grounds. The most accessible and
clear introduction to the subject of regression and causal inference,
including IV,  that I know of is Gelman, chapters 9 and 10 (with  lots of R
code and further references).

http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/arm/

All the best,



Antonio.

**********************************************************
             Political Methodology E-Mail List
   Editors: Melanie Goodrich, <[log in to unmask]>
            Delia Bailey, <[log in to unmask]>
**********************************************************
        Send messages to [log in to unmask]
  To join the list, cancel your subscription, or modify
           your subscription settings visit:

          http://polmeth.wustl.edu/polmeth.php

**********************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2