POLMETH Archives

Political Methodology Society

POLMETH@LISTSERV.WUSTL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Political Methodology Society <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:16:19 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (113 lines)
The Spatial Autocorrelation problem is something that
needs to be considered because most elements in the
csts matrix are probably not independent.  Not
checking to determine whether a csts is stationary
over time can lead to spurious conclusions and the
tests for stationarity for a panel over time are
different than Time Series tests for stationarity.
(Chapter 12 of Baltagi has a good explanation as to why.)

TL Long
Full Time Instructor
Department of Liberal Arts
Temple College

[log in to unmask]


------- Original Message -------
From    : Joseph Young[mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent    : 9/25/2008 2:40:50 PM
To      : [log in to unmask]
Cc      : 
Subject : RE: Re: [POLMETH] Matching methods and TSCS
data

 Propensity score matching is starting to become
common among IR types  
who use TSCS data.  The studies that I've seen in IR
that use it have  
done so uncritically.  In my dissertation, I use
matching on TSCS data  
but correct for temporal correlation.  One of the
assumptions of  
matching is that observations are independent. 
Clearly, most  
observations within a panel are not independent. 
This, in my opinion,  
needs to considered, but I'd be interested to hear
what others think  
as well.  I'd be happy to share do-files, the
dissertation and a  
possible fix for this problem.  There is still the
problem of  
potential spatial correlation, which I do not tackle.
 The good (bad)  
news is that this should affect all data not just TSCS.

Joe

**********************************
Joseph K. Young
Assistant Professor
Department of Political Science
Southern Illinois University
[log in to unmask]
 http://mypage.siu.edu/jkyoung 
**********************************

On Sep 25, 2008, at 10:46 AM, Carlos Rodriguez wrote:

> Dear list,
>
> I have the following doubt: is it possible
(correct) to do matching
> with time-series cross sectional data?  I have only
seen it used with
> panel (cross-sectional) data.
> thanks
>
> carlos
>
>
**********************************************************
>             Political Methodology E-Mail List
>   Editors: Melanie Goodrich, <[log in to unmask]>
>            Delia Bailey, <[log in to unmask]>
>
**********************************************************
>        Send messages to [log in to unmask]
>  To join the list, cancel your subscription, or modify
>           your subscription settings visit:
>
>           http://polmeth.wustl.edu/polmeth.php 
>
>
**********************************************************

**********************************************************
             Political Methodology E-Mail List
   Editors: Melanie Goodrich, <[log in to unmask]>
            Delia Bailey, <[log in to unmask]>
**********************************************************
        Send messages to [log in to unmask]
  To join the list, cancel your subscription, or modify
           your subscription settings visit:

           http://polmeth.wustl.edu/polmeth.php 

**********************************************************

**********************************************************
             Political Methodology E-Mail List
   Editors: Melanie Goodrich, <[log in to unmask]>
            Delia Bailey, <[log in to unmask]>
**********************************************************
        Send messages to [log in to unmask]
  To join the list, cancel your subscription, or modify
           your subscription settings visit:

          http://polmeth.wustl.edu/polmeth.php

**********************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2