POLMETH Archives

Political Methodology Society

POLMETH@LISTSERV.WUSTL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tim Blessing <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Political Methodology Society <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 18 Jun 2014 14:47:05 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Having worked with Census data for more than thirty-five years I consider most of it to be horrifically unreliable. It is also better than IRS data. The best census data is the basic county-level data (believe it or not) since the definitions and methods of counting are fairly stable at that level (particularly from 1960 on).
I would, therefore, suggest that you use county-level data, even if much of it is not electronic. 
Tim H. Blessing, Ph.D.Professor of History and Political ScienceAlvernia University

 		 	   		  
**********************************************************
             Political Methodology E-Mail List
   Editors: Ethan Porter        <[log in to unmask]>
            Gregory Whitfield   <[log in to unmask]>
**********************************************************
        Send messages to [log in to unmask]
  To join the list, cancel your subscription, or modify
           your subscription settings visit:

          http://polmeth.wustl.edu/polmeth.php

**********************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2